Green and white superbike parked in a car park

Comparison · Helmets

Shark Spartan GT Pro Carbon vs HJC RPHA 71: premium full-face helmets with sun visors

Two premium full-face helmets with sun visors compared: weight, shell sizes, materials, Pinlock, fastening and who each one suits.

By the Riders Emotion team · Updated

If you buy through our links, Amazon pays us a small commission at no extra cost to you. It never affects our scores. How we are funded.

Two premium full-face helmets with an internal sun visor and a Pinlock in the box. The Shark bets on carbon and weight; the HJC on shell sizes and fit.

Head to head

Shark Spartan GT Pro Carbon vs HJC RPHA 71
SpecShark Spartan GT Pro CarbonHJC RPHA 71
Overall score8.58.6
Safety8.89.0
Comfort8.68.8
Quietness8.08.6
Ventilation8.68.2
Value8.08.2
Weight1,450 g1,567 g
ApprovalECE 22.06ECE 22.06
Shell sizes24
Shell materialCarbon fibre and multi-axial glass fibreComposite fibre PIM+ (carbon, glass and aramid)
Internal sun visorYesYes
Pinlock anti-fogIncluded (120 Max Vision)Included
Fastening—Double D-ring
SizesXS to XXLXS to XXL

Highlighted in orange: the winner of each measurable spec. Manufacturer data.

Weight: Shark wins

Around 1,450 g for the Spartan GT Pro Carbon and around 1,567 g for the RPHA 71, according to their makers.

Shell sizes: HJC wins

The RPHA 71 comes in four shell sizes; the Spartan in two. If you are a very small or very large size, the HJC will be better proportioned.

Materials

  • Shark: carbon and multi-axial glass fibre.
  • HJC: PIM+ composite (carbon, glass and aramid).

Both are ECE 22.06 approved.

Details

  • Pinlock: both included (a 120 Max Vision on the Shark).
  • Fastening: double-D on the HJC.

Verdict

More in our full-face helmet guide.

In this article

The products in this article